What I learned when I was... 10?

Well, I was watching Beck on Friday, and he was talking about "global warming" and the treaty that President Obama will probably sign. I don't want to talk about the treaty, because the thought of it will probably make my head burst into flames. I want to talk tonight about CO2.

Now, these "scientists" that are talking about how CO2 is a "green-house gas" and destroying our atmosphere, apparently missed out on the fourth grade. CO2 is carbon dioxide. One thing that drives me nuts when people are talking about the whole "global warming" thing is that they don't mention that we all exhale carbon dioxide. They also seem to neglect to mention that carbon dioxide is critical in photosynthesis. I'll even put in a pretty little diagram so there's no confusion:

Do you see one of the things released? If you said oxygen, you're correct! Do you know what needs oxygen to survive? You're right, we do!

Okay, lets put this together.... We inhale oxygen, exhale CO2, plants/trees take in CO2 and release oxygen. What an insane idea I just had. If CO2 is such a problem, which it isn't, but let's just say it is, here's my plan: plant more trees/plants. Doesn't that make sense to you? Wouldn't that balance out the problem? I mean, I know I don't have a PhD, but come on...




(photo from http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0775714.html )

Uh-oh, the peacock is in trouble....

Bad peacock! Bad!

I just read this article at msnbc.com. The White House can't be happy that the media outlet that is the deepest in their pockets, is posting an AP story about how the dems. are stretching the truth about those "evil" insurance companies.

That is unacceptable! Rahm and David had better go back on CNN and put MSNBC in their place. They posted something that they most likely didn't get approved by the White House, they can't be allowed to do that. The article doesn't help out the dems and their health care goals, so they're obviously not a news organization.

Yeah, I know, that's not going to happen.

I love this war they've raged on FOX. They must think that we're stupid enough to fall for it. With all of the misdirection they've sent our way, they apparently think we aren't expecting more. Have you noticed the news is a lot less about health care, and a lot more about H1N1 being declared a national emergency, or about this outright attack on FOX News? They're doing everything they can to get it passed. And it won't surprise me if they try something like this. I checked out that blog today, and saw that video, and was stunned. Congressman Murtha doesn't care, does he? These people just don't care.

I just hope people see what's happening and remember this at election time.

Yeah, I watch him, so what?

Alright, so I'm a bit late on this, so I apologize, but I really can't believe it. I mean, I should. How does anything surprise me anymore?




Okay, so the title of this post admits, I do watch Glenn Beck. You may not like him, but he's one of the only people showing us who these people in the White House are. I've actually heard people say that he's a jerk, insane, or worse, but the only people I've heard that from are far lefties that are afraid of the truth.

Anyway, Beck made a good point the other day. He had the video above on his show last Thursday, and yet the media has largely ignored what she said. His point was this: for an entire week the media covered a couple of phrases that Rush Limbaugh didn't say that had major financial implications to him. For a week they trashed him, and continued on about it, yet they haven't touched this story. Why? Why is someone who's trying to buy an NFL team more important that the Communications Director in the White House saying that Mao Tse Tung is one of her favorite political philosophers and someone she turns to most? How is that okay? How is it okay that so many in this administration are practically in love with people as terrible as Mao Tse Tung, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, or any of these other crazed dictators? Is this what you want America? You want leaders that actually think these guys had it right?

When will this end?

Is that bile I taste?

This is going to be a rather short post, because I am supposed to be getting ready for work, but I saw this article and thought I was going to vomit.

Why does it not surprise me that someone nominated Barack Obama for the Nobel Peace Prize? According to that article, the deadline for nomination is February 1st. He'd only been president for about two weeks!!!

How is someone who is causing such division in this country win a Nobel Peace Prize? He so far left of most of the people in this country, and trying to "fundamentally change" America to a place most Americans don't want. So they give him a Nobel Peace Prize?

Seriously makes me sick.

Where do these guys come from?

First off, I want to apologize for not posting for awhile. I have been insanely busy, and haven't had much of a chance to keep up with things going on. Things are happening so fast, that if you don't stay caught up, you'll get lost. Every day, it seems, there is something new coming out. Sometimes it just makes your head spin.

While most of the media is focusing on health care, H1N1, or (for awhile) the 2016 Olympics, things are being discovered about our Assistant Deputy Secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools. (What a title, right?) It has been known for awhile now, to those who pay attention, that Jennings is very pro-gay rights. Which, that is his decision. He's liberal, so it doesn't surprise me in the slightest. What bothers me is his support for "man-boy" sexual activities. Even on his Wikipedia page it talks about how in one of his books he wrote about a student he counseled that had sexual activity with an adult male. The boy says he was 16 at the time, which apparently is the age of consent in Massachusetts. Frankly, I don't care in the slightest what the age of consent is. The fact that all he really told the kid was, "I hope you wore a condom", is so far beyond wrong.

Oh, but it doesn't stop there. Jennings wrote the forward for a book called Queering Elementary Education. I haven't honestly read his forward, or the book, but if you write a forward for a book, you obviously are relating yourself to, and most likely supporting the concept/goal of the book. Who out there thinks that someone wanting to "queer" elementary education is the right man for the job of the "Safe School Czar"? I don't want schools teaching my child that it's okay to be homosexual, or that it's natural. Anyone that is homosexual has made a choice to be so. Everyone. You're not born with a homosexual gene, or some kind of chemical imbalance that makes you homosexual. Just like you have the choice to have sex before marriage, you also choose who you have sex with. Individuals that have sex outside of marriage don't have genes that make them have sex. They choose it, and I don't want my children being taught by schools that it's a natural, or acceptable choice. That is not the place of the school system, it's for the parents to be able to teach their morals and values.

What ever happened to math, science, and history?

Where does President Obama find these people?